The Body of God: Major themes in Bahá’u’lláh's Surih of the Temple
- Details
- Resources
One Bahá’í belief essential to understanding a major theme of the Súriy-i-Haykal is the concept of how God delegates authority to humankind. Stated as a concomitant of the methodology by which God gradually advances society age to age through the advent of the Manifestations, this law is best described as gradualness or Qadar. Simply put, learning is constrained by degree, by the fact that, though ultimately destined to succeed, the path to the Lesser Peace necessitates that we acquire new learning and implement it by degrees, whether as individuals or as a global community.
Deepening questions
- Why must God guide the advancement of civilization indirectly?
- Why must the Manifestations also employ an indirect methodology?
- How is this methodology of delegation of authority articulated in the Surih of the Temple?
- What literary devices make this work so abstruse for most people?
- Why do you think Bahá'u'lláh considered this tablet so important?
- To what extent is this work an allegory, and why do your think Bahá'u'lláh employed this narrative approach?
- What are some of the various levels of meaning in the "Temple"?
- What is intended by ascribing to this work the notion of "The Body of God"?
- What are some of the most noteworthy parts in each of the Five letters?
John S. Hatcher
Dr. John S. Hatcher received his BA and MA degrees at Vanderbilt University, and his PhD at the University of Georgia. He is Professor Emeritus at the University of South Florida where he taught in the English Department for forty years and headed graduate studies in English Literature. An author and speaker, Professor Hatcher has published over a hundred poems and articles, and twenty-seven books. He presently serves as Editor on the Association of Bahá’í Studies Publishing Committee.
46th Annual Conference
The views expressed in this recording are those of the presenter and do not necessarily represent the views of the Association for Bahá’í Studies, nor the authoritative explications of Bahá’í writings.